Search for: "C. A. Matlock"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2008, 5:18 am
May 8, 2008) (Matlock previously applied to a vehicle in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
Oregon explains Randolph, Matlock, and Rodriguez in detail where the objector was removed from the scene. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:36 pm
I probably should have made like Matlock and flipped him off. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 5:43 am
We decline to adopt the Ninth Circuit's reasoning and thus do not expand the holding of Randolph at the expense of Matlock. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:27 am
Matlock v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:23 am
Therefore, this was a case of common authority under Matlock. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:29 am
Gardiner Barry C. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:17 am
Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 171 (1974)). [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 12:55 pm
Matlock, 415 U.S. at 169. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:01 am
C. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 3:57 am
See Rodriguez, 497 U.S. at 180; Matlock, 415 U.S. at 166. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 5:01 am
Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 171, 94 S. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 7:03 am
Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 178 n.14 (1974). [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 1:30 pm
Here, the co-occupant defendant was not absent, as was the defendant in Matlock. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 8:45 am
Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 172-73, 94 S.Ct. 988, 994 (1974). [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 1:13 pm
Matlock B. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 1:09 pm
Matlock B. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:24 am
His actions reasonably led the officers to believe that, like the woman in the doorway with the baby on her hip in Matlock, Flynn showed he belonged in the residence and had sufficient authority over it, including the basement area, to further authorize the police to enter not only the residence generally but also to go downstairs to investigate the possibly criminal activity about which he had called them. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:07 am
Second, the Randolph Court seemed to have structured the holding as an exception to the general rule of Rodriguez and Matlock that a cotenant may consent to the search of a residence, id. at 106, and that this exception was narrowly drawn along a "fine line. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:51 am
Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 171 n.7 (1974) ("The authority which justifies the third-party consent does not rest upon the law of property ... but rests rather on mutual use of the property by persons generally having joint access or control for most purposes. [read post]
